a new trick for your manfrotto XProB

Bet you didn't know it could do this! Manfrotto don't seem to. I've seen loads of reviews for the XProB series of tripods, and they've all said that a disadvantage of them is that you can't invert the central column for extreme, low-level shooting.
You can you know...

Before you do this, a quick disclaimer. If you damage your camera using it like this, it's not my fault. Be careful, and remember to lock the column in the normal manner. Otherwise you'll drop your camera on its head. And there's a slight possibility that the safety button will be dented too (I don't actually believe that part, but I have to cover my bases). If it is,then that won't be my fault either. However, mine is undamaged, and has been for the last year and a half that I've been using it like this.

The first step is to remove the central column. To do this, raise the column up to its maximum height. Push the button at the end of the column, as if you are about to swing it to the horizontal position.


Push hard enough, and the safety button will retract enough to slide through the pivoting collar.
Otherwise, use a finger to push the safety button down, while pulling the column straight up. You should be able to remove it quite easily.


Now, swing the column upside-down, and align it so the the safety button lines up with the collar notch. Make sure the collar is in the vertical position. Push and hold the safety button, and push the column into place. Release the button when it passes the collar.


You are now free to use the column in the inverted position. Simply reverse the steps to return it to the upright position. It may seem fiddly at first, but with a little practice, the process is quite quick, freeing you up to lie face down in the mud to get some really low angles.

Supplementary lighting for macro

I was recently asked about a comment I had made on using flash for my most of my macro shots, by someone wanting to know if they would have to spend lots of money. The only means of flash at their disposal was the built in flash unit. They used canon kit, but I don't. Here's how I answered:

I very rarely use my on-board flash. I try to approach my macro work as miniature portraits, which usually means low fill-flash (it can be okay for this sometimes), and side/ backlighting. I try to keep it as low as possible though, and mostly use ambient light. The flashes are really there to make things sparkle a bit, or pick out some of the textures.

I'm currently using the Nikon SB-800, and the R1C1 kit, which I think equates to the Canon 580EX II and Canon MT-24EX. I think there are couple of cheaper options, but the key is being able to get the flash unit away from the camera. Unfortunately, that's the massive benefit of using nikon: wireless is fitted as standard across the range. For yourself, you'll need TTL cables or a transmitter. Cables are a bit of a faff, because if you move, the flash comes with you, but they're definitely the cheaper option.
If you haven't got one though, get yourself a five-way diffuser/ reflector. They are amazingly useful, and I know someone who uses one almost exclusively. She's got some of the best fungi shots I've ever seen, so you don't need to go all out on complex flash set-ups. Here's some of the ways I use flash in my photos:
Two R200 flash units. One at rear right for rimlight, -3.0EV. One at front left through diffuser, -1.7EV. Note that the lower-powered flash is closer to the subject, so light looks brighter, but falls off very quickly.

No flash used. Fill-light from gold reflector

Two R200 flash units. One at left for definition, -1.3EV. One at front right through diffuser, -1.3EV.

SB-800 mounted on camera, -1.3 EV for fill. Stofen diffuser dome attached.

one R200 flash unit to the rear right, 3 stops below ambient for rimlight (-3.0 EV).

SB-800 mounted on camera, -1.3 EV to freeze movement. Note that this could be done with built-in flash, but light would be harsher because of smaller flash.













Full flash (no ambient registered). One SB-800 bounced from front right off gold reflector.














No flash used. Fill-light from gold reflector


















The tricky part will always be figuring out what lighting suits what subject. That will depend very much on the situation, and the background effects you want to produce. Trial and error is a huge part of this. So in short, it's worth spending a bit of money if you really want to improve your results, it doesn't have to be too much in the grand scheme of things, but a dedicated macro light rig will certainly open up your options.

What's it all about Alfie?

Well, actually, it's David.

I've started this blog as a means of sharing some of my experiences as a photographer. It's intended as a reference point, working on the theory that if I write things down as I learn, I might remember them. That's the plan anyway. If others can benefit from my learning curves, then it's a bonus.

I think honesty is important. We've all been to friend's weddings, or popular locations, and run into a photographer who mocks us with our inexperience and cheap equipment (it's all relative, after all). I don't want to be that guy. The only way I've developed my skills is by talking to other photographers (because most of the greats are a friendly bunch), and doing my homework. I don't mind sharing that knowledge with others, as it always seems to open doors. So feel free to look around, laugh at my mistakes, and take what you can from them.